Complaint and message dated 18 February 2014 from General Electric whistleblower and advocate - Seema Sapra - Writ Petition (Civil) 1280/ 2012 - in the matter of Seema Sapra v. General Electric Company and Others in the Delhi High Court

Message sent by me to DCP S B S Tyagi: 

------ SMS ------
To: +919818099041
Sent: Feb 18, 2014 22:44
Subject: I am dizzy, unsteady on my legs,

I am dizzy, unsteady on my legs, My eyesight is blurred and I have a stomach pain and muscular tremors all since after coming into Amici cafe today and because of being poisoned here today. Seema Sapra
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone

Update to my email below posted at 21:25 pm

Two Amici cafe employees Manoj Kumar and Balwant Singh were used to target me today in Amici Cafe. 

Balwant Singh stood next to my table for a long time and he was carrying something with a toxic chemical on him or it was on his clothes. 

I spoke to the area manager and asked for Balwant Singh  to be asked to stand away from my table and he was sent to the first floor.

After the area manager Dileem Akhtar who was in the cafe left, this man Balwant Singh again returned near my table. 

The other man Manoj Kumar was part of what was going on. After the area manager left, Manoj Kumar and Balwant Singh again released some pesticide near my table. 

The restaurant manager is one Mahipal.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:47 PM
Subject: Complaint and message dated 18 February 2014 from General Electric whistleblower and advocate - Seema Sapra - Writ Petition (Civil) 1280/ 2012 - in the matter of Seema Sapra v. General Electric Company and Others in the Delhi High Court
To: lggc.delhi@nic.in, "rg.dhc@nic.in" <rg.dhc@nic.in>, Bhim Sain Bassi <cp.bsbassi@nic.in>, joe.kaeser@siemens.com, dch@nic.in, secypc@nic.in, "splcp-admin-dl@nic.in" <splcp-admin-dl@nic.in>, "splcp-intandops-dl@nic.in" <splcp-intandops-dl@nic.in>, "splcp-antiriotcell-dl@nic.in" <splcp-antiriotcell-dl@nic.in>, "splcp-security-dl@nic.in" <splcp-security-dl@nic.in>, "splcp-vigilance-dl@nic.in" <splcp-vigilance-dl@nic.in>, "splcp-crime-dl@nic.in" <splcp-crime-dl@nic.in>, "splcp-armed-dl@nic.in" <splcp-armed-dl@nic.in>, "splcp-operation-dl@nic.in" <splcp-operation-dl@nic.in>, "splcp-traffic-dl@nic.in" <splcp-traffic-dl@nic.in>, "splcp-pl-dl@nic.in" <splcp-pl-dl@nic.in>, splcp-trg-dl@nic.in, "splcp-splcell-dl@nic.in" <splcp-splcell-dl@nic.in>, jtcp-cr-dl@nic.in, "jtcp-nr-dl@nic.in" <jtcp-nr-dl@nic.in>, jtcp-ser-dl@nic.in, jtcp-swr-dl@nic.in, "splcp-pandi-dl@nic.in" <splcp-pandi-dl@nic.in>, jtcp-training-dl@nic.in, "jtcp-phq-dl@nic.in" <jtcp-phq-dl@nic.in>, jtcp-ga-dl@nic.in, "jtcpt_dtp@nic.in" <jtcpt_dtp@nic.in>, "jtcp-crime-dl@nic.in" <jtcp-crime-dl@nic.in>, jtcp-splcell-dl@nic.in, jtcp-sec-dl@nic.in, "jcpsec@rb.nic.in" <jcpsec@rb.nic.in>, "addlcp-eow-dl@nic.in" <addlcp-eow-dl@nic.in>, jtcp-vigilance-dl@nic.in, jtcp-sb-dl@nic.in, addlcp-crime-dl@nic.in, "addlcpt-dtp@nic.in" <addlcpt-dtp@nic.in>, "addlcp-caw-dl@nic.in" <addlcp-caw-dl@nic.in>, "addlcp-security-dl@nic.in" <addlcp-security-dl@nic.in>, addlcp-ptc-dl@nic.in, "addlcp-lic-dl@nic.in" <addlcp-lic-dl@nic.in>, dcp-west-dl@nic.in, addlcp-se-dl@nic.in, "dcp-southwest-dl@nic.in" <dcp-southwest-dl@nic.in>, "dcp-crime-dl@nic.in" <dcp-crime-dl@nic.in>, dcp-eow-dl@nic.in, dcp-splcell-dl@nic.in, dcp-east-dl@nic.in, dcp-northeast-dl@nic.in, "dcp-central-dl@nic.in" <dcp-central-dl@nic.in>, dcp-north-dl@nic.in, dcp-northwest-dl@nic.in, "dcp-south-dl@nic.in" <dcp-south-dl@nic.in>, dcp-outer-dl@nic.in, "dcp-newdelhi-dl@nic.in" <dcp-newdelhi-dl@nic.in>, "dcp-pcr-dl@nic.in" <dcp-pcr-dl@nic.in>, "dcp-southeast-dl@nic.in" <dcp-southeast-dl@nic.in>, dcp-vigilance-dl@nic.in, dcp-igiairport-dl@nic.in, "sandeep.bamzai@mailtoday.in" <sandeep.bamzai@mailtoday.in>, "director.iic@nic.in" <director.iic@nic.in>, "secretary.iic@nic.in" <secretary.iic@nic.in>, South Asia Initiative Harvard University <sainit@fas.harvard.edu>, "sorina.tira@emdiesels.com" <sorina.tira@emdiesels.com>, "joanne.brozovich@emdiesels.com" <joanne.brozovich@emdiesels.com>, "customs@emdiesels.com" <customs@emdiesels.com>, Mahesh Batra <itcphq-dl@nic.in>, "janpathten@yahoo.com" <janpathten@yahoo.com>, "sho-tilakmarg-dl@nic.in" <sho-tilakmarg-dl@nic.in>, "sho-tuglakrd-dl@nic.in" <sho-tuglakrd-dl@nic.in>, "addl-dcp2-nd-dl@nic.in" <addl-dcp2-nd-dl@nic.in>, "acp-vivekvhr-dl@nic.in" <acp-vivekvhr-dl@nic.in>, So Dcp <sodcpeast@gmail.com>, "sho-vivekvhr-dl@nic.in" <sho-vivekvhr-dl@nic.in>, "office@rahulgandhi.in" <office@rahulgandhi.in>, Dayan Krishnan <krishnandayan@gmail.com>, Arvind Nigam <nigamak@gmail.com>, "sho-hndin-dl@nic.in" <sho-hndin-dl@nic.in>, "mediaindia@worldbank.org" <mediaindia@worldbank.org>, "indiapic@worldbank.org" <indiapic@worldbank.org>, "mohitchandmathur@hotmail.com" <mohitchandmathur@hotmail.com>, Amarjit Singh Chandhiok <achandhiok@gmail.com>, "enquiries@in.g4s.com" <enquiries@in.g4s.com>, "arjun.wallia@securitas-india.com" <arjun.wallia@securitas-india.com>, "kris.van.den.briel@securitas.in" <kris.van.den.briel@securitas.in>, "contact.us@securitas-india.com" <contact.us@securitas-india.com>, "contact@securitasinc.com" <contact@securitasinc.com>, "delhi@eaglehunters.com" <delhi@eaglehunters.com>, "dan.ryan@g4s.com" <dan.ryan@g4s.com>, "grahame.gibson@g4s.com" <grahame.gibson@g4s.com>, "nick.buckles@g4s.com" <nick.buckles@g4s.com>, "s.hameed@nic.in" <s.hameed@nic.in>, "rajendra.pachauri@yale.edu" <rajendra.pachauri@yale.edu>, "Madder, Emily" <emily.madder@siemens.com>, "banmali.agrawala@ge.com" <banmali.agrawala@ge.com>, "peter.loescher@siemens.com" <peter.loescher@siemens.com>, "cmukund@mukundcherukuri.com" <cmukund@mukundcherukuri.com>, "duadel@duaassociates.com" <duadel@duaassociates.com>, "ranji@duaassociates.com" <ranji@duaassociates.com>, rajshekhar rao <rao.rajshekhar@gmail.com>, "mail@aglaw.in" <mail@aglaw.in>, "vikram@duaassociates.com" <vikram@duaassociates.com>, "neeraj@duaassociates.com" <neeraj@duaassociates.com>, "sec-jus@gov.in" <sec-jus@gov.in>, "pk.malhotra@nic.in" <pk.malhotra@nic.in>, "ramakrishnan.r@nic.in" <ramakrishnan.r@nic.in>, "atulkaushik@nic.in" <atulkaushik@nic.in>, "oo.prlsecypmo@gov.in" <oo.prlsecypmo@gov.in>, "pulok@gov.in" <pulok@gov.in>, "jmg.vc@nic.in" <jmg.vc@nic.in>, "r.sri_kumar@nic.in" <r.sri_kumar@nic.in>, "cvc@nic.in" <cvc@nic.in>, "hm@nic.in" <hm@nic.in>, "hshso@nic.in" <hshso@nic.in>, "complaintcell-ncw@nic.in" <ncw@nic.in>, "complaintcell-ncw@nic.in" <complaintcell-ncw@nic.in>, "sgnhrc@nic.in" <sgnhrc@nic.in>, "dg-nhrc@nic.in" <dg-nhrc@nic.in>, "newhaven@ic.fbi.gov" <newhaven@ic.fbi.gov>, "ny1@ic.fbi.gov" <ny1@ic.fbi.gov>, "usanys.wpcomp@usdoj.gov" <usanys.wpcomp@usdoj.gov>, "nalin.jain@ge.com" <nalin.jain@ge.com>, "amit.kumar@ge.com" <amit.kumar@ge.com>, "pradeep.gupta@ge.com" <pradeep.gupta@ge.com>, "sriram.nagarajan@ge.com" <sriram.nagarajan@ge.com>, Wiltschek Susanne EDA WSU <susanne.wiltschek@eda.admin.ch>, "helpline@eda.admin.ch" <helpline@eda.admin.ch>, _EDA-Vertretung-New-Delhi <ndh.vertretung@eda.admin.ch>, _EDA-VISA New-Delhi <ndh.visa@eda.admin.ch>, _EDA-Etat Civil New Delhi <ndh.etatcivil@eda.admin.ch>, "vertretung@ndh.rep.admin.ch" <vertretung@ndh.rep.admin.ch>, "beatrice.latteier@eda.admin.ch" <beatrice.latteier@eda.admin.ch>, "emb@rusembassy.in" <emb@rusembassy.in>, indconru indconru <indconru@gmail.com>, "web.newdelhi@fco.gov.uk" <web.newdelhi@fco.gov.uk>, "conqry.newdelhi@fco.gov.uk" <conqry.newdelhi@fco.gov.uk>, "LegalisationEnquiries@fco.gov.uk" <LegalisationEnquiries@fco.gov.uk>, "delegation-india@eeas.europa.eu" <delegation-india@eeas.europa.eu>, "re-india.commerce@international.gc.ca" <re-india.commerce@international.gc.ca>, "info@new-delhi.diplo.de" <info@new-delhi.diplo.de>, Ambassaden New Delhi <ambassaden.new-delhi@foreign.ministry.se>, "delamb@um.dk" <delamb@um.dk>, "emb.newdelhi@mfa.no" <emb.newdelhi@mfa.no>, "chinaemb_in@mfa.gov.cn" <chinaemb_in@mfa.gov.cn>, "InfoDesk@ohchr.org" <InfoDesk@ohchr.org>, "Press-Info@ohchr.org" <Press-Info@ohchr.org>, "civilsociety@ohchr.org" <civilsociety@ohchr.org>, "nationalinstitutions@ohchr.org" <nationalinstitutions@ohchr.org>, "webmaster@ambafrance-in.org" <webmaster@ambafrance-in.org>, "info_visa_delhi@ambafrance-in.org" <info_visa_delhi@ambafrance-in.org>, "VA@ndh.rep.admin.ch" <VA@ndh.rep.admin.ch>, "indne@unhcr.org" <indne@unhcr.org>, "ambasciata.newdelhi@esteri.it" <ambasciata.newdelhi@esteri.it>, "chinaconsul_kkt@mfa.gov.cn" <chinaconsul_kkt@mfa.gov.cn>, "chinaconsul_mum_in@mfa.gov.cn" <chinaconsul_mum_in@mfa.gov.cn>, "webmaster@mfa.gov.cn" <webmaster@mfa.gov.cn>, "in@mofcom.gov.cn" <in@mofcom.gov.cn>, "advocatesapnachauhan@yahoo.com" <advocatesapnachauhan@yahoo.com>, "sapnachauhan.chauhan192@gmail.com" <sapnachauhan.chauhan192@gmail.com>, "dcbi@cbi.gov.in" <dcbi@cbi.gov.in>, Manpreet Lamba <manpreet.lamba@azbpartners.com>, "mr@rb.railnet.gov.in" <mr@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "msrk@rb.railnet.gov.in" <msrk@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "edpgmsrk@rb.railnet.gov.in" <edpgmsrk@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "msrb@rb.railnet.gov.in" <msrb@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "crb@rb.railnet.gov.in" <crb@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "srppscrb@rb.railnet.gov.in" <srppscrb@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "osdpri@rb.railnet.gov.in" <osdpri@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "dsconf@rb.railnet.gov.in" <dsconf@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "fc@rb.railnet.gov.in" <fc@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "ppsfc@rb.railnet.gov.in" <ppsfc@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "edfc@rb.railnet.gov.in" <edfc@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "ml@rb.railnet.gov.in" <ml@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "ppsml@rb.railnet.gov.in" <ppsml@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "psml@rb.railnet.gov.in" <psml@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "osdml@rb.railnet.gov.in" <osdml@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "me@rb.railnet.gov.in" <me@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "ppsme@rb.railnet.gov.in" <ppsme@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "osdme@rb.railnet.gov.in" <osdme@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "mm@rb.railnet.gov.in" <mm@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "ms@rb.railnet.gov.in" <ms@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "ppsms@rb.railnet.gov.in" <ppsms@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "dpc1@rb.railnet.gov.in" <dpc1@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "mt@rb.railnet.gov.in" <mt@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "srppsmt@rb.railnet.gov.in" <srppsmt@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "ppsmt@rb.railnet.gov.in" <ppsmt@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "dtcord@rb.railnet.gov.in" <dtcord@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "secyrb@rb.railnet.gov.in" <secyrb@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "pssecyrb@rb.railnet.gov.in" <pssecyrb@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "dgrhs@rb.railnet.gov.in" <dgrhs@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "ppsdgrhs@rb.railnet.gov.in" <ppsdgrhs@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "dgrpf@rb.railnet.gov.in" <dgrpf@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "srppsdgrpf@rb.railnet.gov.in" <srppsdgrpf@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "edcc@rb.railnet.gov.in" <edcc@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "aml@rb.railnet.gov.in" <aml@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "legaladv@rb.railnet.gov.in" <legaladv@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "amm@rb.railnet.gov.in" <amm@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "amplg@rb.railnet.gov.in" <amplg@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "r_s_chidambaram@cat.com" <r_s_chidambaram@cat.com>, "sunand.sharma@alstom.com" <sunand.sharma@alstom.com>, "hiren.vyas@alstom.com" <hiren.vyas@alstom.com>, "vandana.dhir@alstom.com" <vandana.dhir@alstom.com>, "jojo.alexander@alstom.com" <jojo.alexander@alstom.com>, "patrick.ledermann@alstom.com" <patrick.ledermann@alstom.com>, "rathin.basu@alstom.com" <rathin.basu@alstom.com>, "Dimitrief, Alexander (GE, Corporate)" <alexander.dimitrief@ge.com>, "Eglash, Jeffrey C (GE, Corporate)" <jeffrey.eglash@ge.com>, Nanju Ganpathy <nanju.ganpathy@azbpartners.com>, "bradford.berenson@ge.com" <bradford.berenson@ge.com>, "brackett.denniston@ge.com" <brackett.denniston@ge.com>, "jeffrey.immelt@ge.com" <jeffrey.immelt@ge.com>, "john.flannery@ge.com" <john.flannery@ge.com>, "delhihighcourt@nic.in" <delhihighcourt@nic.in>, "pmosb@nic.in" <pmosb@nic.in>, "askdoj@usdoj.gov" <askdoj@usdoj.gov>, "CHAIRMANOFFICE@SEC.GOV" <CHAIRMANOFFICE@sec.gov>, "help@sec.gov" <help@sec.gov>, "fcpa.fraud@usdoj.gov" <fcpa.fraud@usdoj.gov>, "radhakrishnan.k@ge.com" <radhakrishnan.k@ge.com>, "tejal.singh@ge.com" <tejal.singh@ge.com>, Sonali Mathur <sonali.mathur@azbpartners.com>, eric.holder@usdoj.gov, "preet.bharara@usdoj.gov" <preet.bharara@usdoj.gov>, "NDwebmail@state.gov" <NDwebmail@state.gov>, "Denise_L._Cote@nysd.uscourts.gov" <Denise_L._Cote@nysd.uscourts.gov>, "ruby_krajick@nysd.uscourts.gov" <ruby_krajick@nysd.uscourts.gov>, "Leonard_B._Sand@nysd.uscourts.gov" <Leonard_B._Sand@nysd.uscourts.gov>, "gloria_rojas@nysd.uscourts.gov" <gloria_rojas@nysd.uscourts.gov>, "william_donald@nysd.uscourts.gov" <william_donald@nysd.uscourts.gov>, "edward_friedland@nysd.uscourts.gov" <edward_friedland@nysd.uscourts.gov>, "richard_wilson@nysd.uscourts.gov" <richard_wilson@nysd.uscourts.gov>, "robert_rogers@nysd.uscourts.gov" <robert_rogers@nysd.uscourts.gov>, "kdonovan-maher@bermandevalerio.com" <kdonovan-maher@bermandevalerio.com>, "rcohen@lowey.com" <rcohen@lowey.com>, "ffetf@usdoj.gov" <ffetf@usdoj.gov>, "Harold_Baer@nysd.uscourts.gov" <Harold_Baer@nysd.uscourts.gov>, "Jed_S._Rakoff@nysd.uscourts.gov" <Jed_S._Rakoff@nysd.uscourts.gov>, "Cathy_Seibel@nysd.uscourts.gov" <Cathy_Seibel@nysd.uscourts.gov>, "Victor_Marrero@nysd.uscourts.gov" <Victor_Marrero@nysd.uscourts.gov>, "fja@federaljudgesassoc.org" <fja@federaljudgesassoc.org>, "supremecourt@nic.in" <supremecourt@nic.in>, "Loretta_A._Preska@nysd.uscourts.gov" <Loretta_A._Preska@nysd.uscourts.gov>, "Ronald J. Keating" <RKeating@bermandevalerio.com>, jtabacco@bermandevalerio.com, bhart@lowey.com, rharwood@hfesq.com, Joseph Guglielmo <jguglielmo@scott-scott.com>, drscott@scott-scott.com, "ombudsperson@corporate.ge.com" <ombudsperson@corporate.ge.com>, Directors@corporate.ge.com, Siemens Ombudsman COM <mail@siemens-ombudsman.com>, Sunder.Venkat@aero.bombardier.com, compliance.office@bombardier.com, nilesh.pattanayak@aero.bombardier.com, pierre.beaudoin@bombardier.com, djohnson@mccarthy.ca, douglas.oberhelman@caterpilllar.com, william.ainsworth@caterpillar.com, CATshareservices@cat.com, BusinessPractices@cat.com, patrick.kron@alstom.com, keith.carr@alstom.com, Jean-David.barnea@usdoj.gov, reed.brodsky@usdoj.gov, andrew.michaelson@usdoj.gov, ellen.davis@usdoj.gov, eric.glover@usdoj.gov, paul.murphy@usdoj.gov, sandra.glover@usdoj.gov, robert.spector@usdoj.gov, christopher.connolly@usdoj.gov, joseph.cordaro@usdoj.gov, david.jones6@usdoj.gov, daniel.filor@usdoj.gov, amy.barcelo@usdoj.gov, christopher.harwood@usdoj.gov, michael.byars@usdoj.gov, benjamin.torrance@usdoj.gov, sarah.normand@usdoj.gov, elizabeth.shapiro@usdoj.gov, alicia.simmons@usdoj.gov, joyce.vance@usdoj.gov, kenyen.brown@usdoj.gov, karen.loeffler@usdoj.gov, andre.birotte@usdoj.gov, melinda.haag@usdoj.gov, laura.duffy@usdoj.gov, john.walsh@usdoj.gov, david.weiss@usdoj.gov, ronald.machen@usdoj.gov, robert.o'neill@usdoj.gov, pamela.marsh@usdoj.gov, wifredo.ferrer@usdoj.gov, michael.moore@usdoj.gov, sally yates <sally.yates@usdoj.gov>, edward.tarver@usdoj.gov, alicia.limtiaco@usdoj.gov, florence.nakakuni@usdoj.gov, wendy.olson@usdoj.gov, james.lewis@usdoj.gov, patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov, stephen.wigginton@usdoj.gov, david.capp@usdoj.gov, joseph.hogsett@usdoj.gov, stephanie.rose@usdoj.gov, nick.klinefeldt@usdoj.gov, kerry.harvey@usdoj.gov, david.hale@usdoj.gov, stephanie.finley@usdoj.gov, rod.rosenstein@usdoj.gov, carmen.ortiz@usdoj.gov, barbara.mcquade@usdoj.gov, b.todd.jones@usdoj.gov, william.martin@usdoj.gov, richard.callahan@usdoj.gov, beth.phillips@usdoj.gov, michael.cotter@usdoj.gov, deborah.gilg@usdoj.gov, daniel.bogden@usdoj.gov, john.kacavas@usdoj.gov, paul.fishman@usdoj.gov, kenneth.gonzales@usdoj.gov, loretta.lynch@usdoj.gov, richard.hartunian@usdoj.gov, william.hochul@usdoj.gov, john.stone@usdoj.gov, anne.tompkins@usdoj.gov, tim.purdon@usdoj.gov, steve.dettelbach@usdoj.gov, carter.stewart@usdoj.gov, sandy.coats@usdoj.gov, zane.memeger@usdoj.gov, peter.smith@usdoj.gov, david.hickton@usdoj.gov, peter.neronha@usdoj.gov, bill.nettles@usdoj.gov, william.killian@usdoj.gov, jerry.martin@usdoj.gov, edward.stanton@usdoj.gov, jose.moreno@usdoj.gov, carlie.christensen@usdoj.gov, tristram.coffin@usdoj.gov, ronald.sharpe@usdoj.gov, neil.macbride@usdoj.gov, timothy.heaphy@usdoj.gov, bill.ihlenfeld@usdoj.gov, booth.goodwin@usdoj.gov, james.santelle@usdoj.gov, john.vaudreuil@usdoj.gov, christopher.crofts@usdoj.gov, bprao@bhel.in, opb@bhel.in, akhatua@bhel.in, csverma@bhel.in, vpandhi@bhel.in, Atul Saraya <saraya@bhel.in>, ajay.sinha@emdiesels.com, "singhadvocate@hotmail.com" <singhadvocate@hotmail.com>, Rajeeve Mehra <mehralaw@gmail.com>, mehralaw@yahoo.co.in, lajita.rajesh@alstom.com, francois.carpentier@alstom.com, armin.bruck@siemens.com, sunil.mathur@siemens.com, benoit.martel@bombardier.com, luis.ramos@bombardier.com, harsh.dhingra@bombardier.com, glen.lehman@caterpillar.com, john.newman@caterpillar.com, peter.solmssen@siemens.com, roland.busch@siemens.com, michael.suess@siemens.com, klaus.helmrich@siemens.com, daniel.desjardins@bombardier.com, james.buda@caterpillar.com, adam.smith@emdiesels.com, glen.lehman@progressrail.com, duane.cantrell@progressrail.com, craig.johnson@caterpillar.com, alert.procedure@alstom.com, harjeetsinghsachdeva@gmail.com, "Zia Mody (zia.mody@azbpartners.com)" <zia.mody@azbpartners.com>, "Warin, F. Joseph" <fwarin@gibsondunn.com>, "Chesley, John" <JChesley@gibsondunn.com>, pk65sharma@yahoo.co.in, confidential@sfo.gsi.gov.uk, public.enquiries@sfo.gsi.gov.uk, "ohhdl@dalailama.com" <ohhdl@dalailama.com>, dhir@dhirassociates.com, amit.sibal@amitsibal.com, stephen.vogt@ic.fbi.gov, luis.quesada@ic.fbi.gov, steven.kessler@ic.fbi.gov, henry.gittleman@ic.fbi.gov, renn.cannon@ic.fbi.gov, stephen.gaudin@ic.fbi.gov, eric.peterson@ic.fbi.gov, jeff.bedford@ic.fbi.gov, david.brooks@ic.fbi.gov, robert.clifford@ic.fbi.gov, mary.warren@ic.fbi.gov, bill.nicholson@ic.fbi.gov, frank.teixeira@ic.fbi.gov, richard.cavalieros@ic.fbi.gov, timothy.langan@ic.fbi.gov, sharon.kuo@ic.fbi.gov, kingman.wong@ic.fbi.gov, daniel.bodony@ic.fbi.gov, christopher.mcmurray@ic.fbi.gov, ralph.hope@ic.fbi.gov, eric.metz@ic.fbi.gov, daniel.baldwin@ic.fbi.gov, alejandro.barbeito@ic.fbi.gov, cary.gleicher@ic.fbi.gov, paul.haertel@ic.fbi.gov, greg.cox@ic.fbi.gov, lazaro.andino@ic.fbi.gov, gabriel.ramirez@ic.fbi.gov, tom.sobocinski@ic.fbi.gov, benjamin.walker@ic.fbi.gov, kirk.striebich@ic.fbi.gov, "Snyder, David" <david.snyder@ic.fbi.gov>, gregory.cox@ic.fbi.gov, katherine.andrews@ic.fbi.gov, carolyn.willson@ic.fbi.gov, mark.nowak@ic.fbi.gov, stuart.wirtz@ic.fbi.gov, lesley.buckler@ic.fbi.gov, daniel.dudzinski@ic.fbi.gov, william.peterson@ic.fbi.gov, connally.brown@ic.fbi.gov, leo.navarette@ic.fbi.gov, lawrence.futa@ic.fbi.gov, gregory.shaffer@ic.fbi.gov, daniel.clegg@ic.fbi.gov, adishaggarwala@yahoo.com, adishaggarwala@hotmail.com, vsondhi@luthra.com, muraritiwari.adv@gmail.com, adv.priyankatyagi@gmail.com, sarlakaushik@yahoo.com, goswamiandassociates@yahoo.co.in, vedbaldev@rediffmail.com, rakeshtikuadvocate@yahoo.com, kkmanan@rediffmail.com, ars.chauhan.co@gmail.com, Usama Siddiqui <musiddiqui@gmail.com>, Rajiv Khosla <advrajivkhosla@gmail.com>, rakeshkochar@hotmail.com, khatri.surya@hotmail.com, puneet mittal <puneetmittal9@gmail.com>, "advamit.sharma@gmail.com" <advamit.sharma@gmail.com>, Attorneynitin@yahoo.com, Rajesh Mishra <attorney.rmishra@gmail.com>, jaibirnagar@gmail.com, bharati@chintan-india.org, Subramanian Swamy <swamy39@gmail.com>, aman.aggarwal@aricent.com, jsers@mea.gov.in, rkchopra@sansad.nic.in, jsdedel@hub.nic.in, gujralrs@nic.in, praful.kumar@nic.in, rkaur@nic.in, bk.prasad@nic.in, sailesh@nic.in, pandey@ment.delhi.nic.in, asdg_mohfw@nic.in, secyexp@nic.in, kedias mail <kedias.mail@gmail.com>, membert-dot@nic.in, secy.president@rb.nic.in, mathew.thomas@rb.nic.in, trmeena@nic.in, aradhana.johri@nic.in, Sho-lodhicolony-dl@nic.in, as@naco.gov.in, csrhw@csrhw.com.cn, cnriec@chinacnr.com, ashmita.sethi@boeing.com, raymond.l.conner@boeing.com, timothy.keating@boeing.com, "deepak@adlakha.com" <deepak@adlakha.com>, deepak verma <justicedverma@gmail.com>, dridzu@nic.in, radiology@primushospital.com, Manish Sisodia <msisodia@gmail.com>, Sid Luthra <sidluthra@gmail.com>, siddharth@sluthra.in, sidharth@sluthra.in, NDBox Library Reference <Libdel@state.gov>
Cc: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@gmail.com>, Seema Sapra <seemasapra@hotmail.com>


To the Chief Justice and Registrar General of the Delhi High Court and
All Others,

All the previous orders from the contempt case being used to target me
(Criminal Contempt Case 3/ 2012) have been removed from the website of
the Delhi High Court or are inaccessible for some reason.

Orders dated 30 January 2014 and 11 February 2014 in Criminal Contempt
Case 3/ 2012 passed by the Division Bench of Sudershan Kumar Misra and
Suresh Kait have not been uploaded on the website of the Delhi High
Court.

Orders dated 30 January 2014 and 11 February 2014 in Writ Petition
Civil 1280/ 2012 passed by the Division Bench of Sudershan Kumar Misra
and Suresh Kait are attached.

As complained earlier, the order dated 11 February 2014 in WP 1280/
2012 wrongly records the appearance of Arvind Nigam as amicus in the
matter when he has not been appointed as amicus in the writ petition.

Also, when the Division Bench did not convene on 11 February 2014 and
when Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra sitting singly informed the
petitioner that the Division Bench would not convene and insisted on
adjourning the writ petition to 7 March 2014, then how can an order be
placed on the court record dated 11 February 2014 signed by both J.
Sudershan Kumar Misra and J. Suresh Kait?

Also orders dated 30 January 2014 and 11 February 2014 in Writ
Petition Civil 1280/ 2012 passed by the Division Bench of Sudershan
Kumar Misra and Suresh Kait are not available on the Delhi High Court
website through a search using the case number but only through a
search using the judges name. Thus these orders cannot be accessed
unless one knows the date of the hearing and the Bench. This appears
to be deliberate.

Further, the order passed by Judge Sanjeev Sachdeva in OMP 647/ 2012
on 12 February 2014 has not been uploaded on the website of the Delhi
High Court.

I also want to clarify that the lawyer who has been targeting me in
the Delhi High Court mentioned in my email below is not Sanjeev
Sachdeva but Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel for the MCD who has
recently been appointed as standing counsel for the DDA in the Delhi
High Court.

This morning, I mentioned in court no 8 before Judge Sudershan Kumar
Misra and requested that the order dated 11 February 2014 be corrected
and the appearance for Arvind Nigam as amicus be deleted. Judge
Sudershan Kumar Misra agreed that this was an error that needed to be
corrected but asked me to bring this to the attention of the Division
Bench on the next date of hearing so that an order correcting this
error could be passed.

Sanjeev Sabharwal and Ravi Sikri were both sitting in court behind me.
In fact Sanjeev Sabharwal had attempted to speak to me outside court 8
but I had moved away. A K Sikri (Ravi Sikri's brother) enabled and
participated in an attempt to murder me on 17 February 2012 and was
rewarded for that by his appointment as a judge of the Supreme Court.
Ravi Sikri and the rest of A K Sikri's family members who are lawyers
are all participating in targeting me because I have placed
incontrovertible evidence on the court record that A K Sikri enabled
and participated in a conspiracy to murder me on 17 February 2012. If
I had not taken steps to prevent this conspiracy from being fulfilled
and if I had not filed the writ petition, I would have been murdered
and ended up dead very much like Sunanda Pushkar and a similar cover
up would have been effectuated. A K Sikri was not perceived as being
likely to be elevated to the Supreme Court and he was bribed with this
promise in return for his enabling my attempted murder.

Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra sat late today. While I was waiting for
him, some toxic fumes were released in his court room.

I am sitting in Amici Cafe in Defence Colony market and for the last
15-20 minutes some toxic chemical fumes are being released near me in
the restaurant in small quantities.

The order dated 28 January 2014 in WP Civil 1280/ 2012 is also attached.

Seema Sapra



On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 17 February 2014
>
>
> To
>
> Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court of India
> The Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court
> The Registrar General of the Delhi High Court
> Chairman, Bar Council of Delhi
> All other members of Bar Council of Delhi
> The Police Commissioner for Delhi
> Registrar Vigilance, Delhi High Court
>
>
> Ref: Whistle-blower corruption and right to life Writ Petition pending
> in the Delhi High Court since February 2012 - Writ Petition (Civil)
> 1280/ 2012 - in the matter of Seema Sapra versus General Electric
> Company & Others AND complaint that I am being poisoned and targeted
> on Delhi High Court premises
>
> All, Tonight I am sleeping in my car parked outside gate 8 of the
> Delhi High Court. Delhi High Court orders in WP 1280/ 2012 direct the
> police to protect my life and property. The Police has failed to
> provide me with any security/ protection. CP Bassi must comply with
> the courts directions and provide me with Z+ security. The threat to
> my life issues from General Electric, Montek Ahluwalia and A S
> Chandhiok because of my whistleblower complaints in WP 1280/ 2012. The
> threat also emanates from Soli Sorabjee Raian Karanjawala, A K Sikri,
> Gita Mittal, P K Bhasin, Sudershan Kumar Misra  and Suresh Kait.
>
> Below are further complaints about how I am being targeted and
> poisoned on Delhi High Court premises.
>
> On 14 February, 2014 the sweeper Mahesh came near me in the Delhi High
> Court canteen and released a pesticide/ poisonous chemical near me.
>
> On several previous occasions, pesticides have been released near me
> in small quantities in the Delhi High Court canteen. Some Delhi High
> Court Canteen cleaning staff, canteen waiters and bar association
> staff have been used to do this. Once this was done by Thapa, a DHCBA
> peon. Policemen providing police security on Delhi High court premises
> are being used to instigate and organise these acts targeting me.
>
> The two canteen managers Sudhir and Yashpal are also participating in
> targeting me. These two are being used to keep a close watch on me in
> the canteen and then waiting or cleaning staff are sent by them near
> me to target me. On several occasions, my food/ drink have also been
> drugged and poisoned in the Delhi High Court canteen by waiting and
> cleaning staff.
>
> Some lawyers  have also released poisonous chemicals or pesticides
> near me in the Delhi High Court canteen. On one occasion, this was
> done by Manish Lamba from AZB. On another occasion a lawyer called
> Sethi did this. Sethi's wife Ashima Sethi works with Pratyush Kumar (a
> former General Electric employee and now with Boeing) who is
> implicated in the corruption, fraud, bribery and forgery complaints
> made by me in the captioned writ petition. On yet another occasion, a
> lawyer called Sanjeev Sachdeva (who has recently been appointed as
> Standing Counsel for the DDA in the Delhi High Court) did this.
>
> On 17 February 2014 in the morning, a Rajasthan Armed Police guard
> (called Shri Bhagwan) misbehaved with me on Delhi High Court premises
> outside the chamber block. He came up to me and stopped less than six
> inches away from me right in front of me and refused to move. This was
> an act of agression. This man has been misbehaving with me on Delhi
> High Court premises for the past several months.
>
> I went to the office of the Delhi Police Security to complain to the
> officer on duty. The office was closed and I was told by two policemen
> there that the concerned police inspector would be available only
> after 9 am.
>
> I went back to the police security office shortly after 9 am and saw
> Inspector Negi and asked to speak to him. He took me to his office and
> I got the distince smell of some pesticide. I continued to speak to
> Inspector Negi and verbally communicated to him my complaint against
> the Rajasthan Armed Police officer called Shri Bhagwan.
>
> The policemen who knew that I intended to go meet the police security
> in charge in his office around 9 am deliberately introduced pesticides
> into the room to target me. In fact, when I was speaking with
> Inspector Negi, another policeman who has been regularly targeting me
> came into the room and sat down.
>
> I was deliberately exposed by policemen to pesticides inside the Delhi
> High Court police security office on the morning of 17 February 2014
> shortly after 9 am.  I will point out the two policemen who knew that
> I would be returning to the police security office at 9 am.
>
> At around 2:45 pm on 17 February 2014, I told the lady manager in the
> Delhi High Court canteen that the sweeper Mahesh had released
> pesticide fumes near me in the canteen on 14 February 2014 and that I
> would complain about this to the police. A short while later, two
> policemen (including another Rajasthan Armed Police guard who has been
> targeting me) came to the canteen and were talking to Sudhir and
> Yashpal, the two other managers for a long time. One of these two
> policemen was also present in the morning on 17 February 2014 when I
> went to the police security office the first time and he knew that I
> would return shortly after 9 am.
>
> Both Yashpal and Sudhir have over the last year or so (since I started
> complaining that I was being targeted, drugged and poisoned in the
> Delhi High Court canteen) acquired visible signs of prosperity and
> their job profile and responsibilities have also been boosted.
>
> Yashpal and Sudhir are using other canteen staff to target me. On 10
> February 2014, a Delhi High Court canteen waiter called Bharat was
> made to physically assault me. I was standing in the door of the
> kitchen to the canteen and speaking to the lady manager asking her to
> prevent Mahesh from mopping the canteen floor with a phenyl mop
> instead of water. This was communicated by the lady manager to Yashpal
> who kept ignoring this request and deliberately made Mahesh mop with
> the phenyl drenched mop right  next to me. Yashpal was also shouting
> unnecessarily so as to create a commotion. The waiter Bharat (who I
> have earlier accused of drugging/ poisoning my food) rushed in and
> pushed me in the chest on my breasts with his elbows. This was
> deliberate and not accidental. The intent was to target me and get me
> to lose my temper. Let me add that both of Bharat's arms and elbows
> made contact with my chest horizontally and with a push. This was not
> an accidental touch. I did not lose my temper and instead told the
> canteen staff present on the spot that I would complain about this in
> writing.
>
> I have complained about this incident and Bharat to the members of the
> DHCBA executive committee (including A S Chandhiok, J P sengh, Mohit
> Mathur, Mohit Gupta, Laxmi Chauhan, Shyam Sharnma etc.,) but so far I
> have not received a response and no action has been taken on this
> complaint.
>
> On 3 February 2014, an advocate's clerk Rajiv Garg had (in a manner
> intended to intimidate and physically threaten me) thrust his upper
> body near my person (invading my personal space and violating my area
> of privacy and personal comfort) after I objected to him smoking on
> the second floor corridor of the old chamber block. His employer
> advocate Pankaj Chopra had then profusely apologised on behalf of the
> clerk and made the clerk apologise to me. However, I do not accept any
> such apology.
>
> I have audio recordings of the incidents involving canteen waiter
> Bharat and the clerk Rajiv Garg.
>
> I am being targeted on DHC  premises using canteen, bar and court
> staff and police court security with participation by lawyers who I
> have named in police complaints and by policemen present on Delhi High
> Court premises.
>
> I have a video and photograph of the two policemen speaking to Yashpal
> and Sudhir in the Delhi High Court canteen on 17 February 2014 in the
> afternoon.
>
>
>
> Seema Sapra
> Advocate & whistleblower and witness in corruption complaints against
> General Electric Company and Montek Singh Ahluwalia
>
>
>
> --
> Seema Sapra

Complaint against Delhi High Court Judges Sudershan Kumar Misra and Suresh Kait and against advocate Arvind Nigam concerning extra-judicial attempts to involve Arvind Nigam in the hearing of Writ Petition Civil 1280/ 2012 (Seema Sapra v. General Electric Company and Others) to facilitate the cover up of the corruption complaints against General Electric and the elimination of the Petitioner/ whistle blower

Please read the following open letter: 

16 February 2014

To

(i)                 Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court of India

(ii)               Chief Justice Ramana, Delhi High Court 

(iii)             The Registrar General, Delhi High Court 

(iv)             Chairman, Bar Council of Delhi

(v)               All other members of Bar Council of Delhi

(vi)             The Central Vigilance Commisioner

(vii)           Delhi Police Commissioner

(viii)         Registrar Vigilance, Delhi High Court

(ix)             Mr Goolam E. Vahanvati, The Attorney General of India, Supreme Court of India

(x)               Mr Rajiv Mehra, Additional Solicitor General to the Union of India, Delhi High Court

(xi)             Mr P K Behera, In-charge Litigation, Union of India, Delhi High Court

Ref: Complaint against Delhi High Court Judges Sudershan Kumar Misra and Suresh Kait and against advocate Arvind Nigam concerning extra-judicial attempts to involve Arvind Nigam in the hearing of Writ Petition Civil 1280/ 2012 (Seema Sapra v. General Electric Company and Others) to facilitate the cover up of the corruption complaints against General Electric and the elimination of the Petitioner/ whistle blower.

 

Arvind Nigam appeared for a General Electric Company (GECAS) in 2010 in the Delhi High Court in a matter concerning Paramount Airways and was instructed by Anuradha Dutt. (See Delhi High Court orders passed in LPA 198/ 2010).

In August 2011, Arvind Nigam advised me to withdraw my corruption complaints against General Electric by misleading me that this would stop attempts to eliminate, murder, and physically harm me. This advice placed me in even greater danger and resulted in my being further poisoned and drugged and would have resulted in my being murdered if I had not finally managed to file WP Civil 1280/ 2012 in February 2012.

In February 2012, Arvind Nigam again misguided me by giving me wrong advice to not include the complaints and evidence of the threat to my life and of attempts to harm me and medical evidence establishing that I had been poisoned and that doctors had covered up the poisoning and had facilitated my elimination by attempting to drug me and to fabricate false medical reports, in the writ petition that I was proposing to file on my corruption complaints against General Electric. He advised me to file three separate writ petitions against General Electric, the Police and against doctors at Max Healthcare and Apollo Hospital. Arvind Nigam deliberately misguided me and I did not follow his suggestion. During a conversation that took place between me and Arvind Nigam in the Delhi High Court canteen on 27/ 28 February 2012, Arvind Nigam read a copy of the draft writ petition that eventually became WP 1280/ 2012 and told me to hold back filing until after 1 March 2012 when he would discuss the matter with me in detail and give me his feedback on my draft petition. I did not wait to discuss the matter with Arvind Nigam and filed WP 1280/ 2012 on 29 February 2012.

On 16 May 2013, Delhi High Court Judge Gita Mittal who was participating in the conspiracy to sabotage the hearing of the corruption writ petition against General Electric and Montek Singh Ahluwalia (WP Civil 1280/ 2012) was asked to recuse herself by the petitioner in CM 6096/ 2013. Instead of recusing herself, Judge Gita Mittal adjourned the application for recusal to 18 July 2013, and appointed Arvind Nigam as amicus curie for the application. On 16 May 2013, Judge Gita Mittal first attempted to appoint Arun Mohan as amicus curie in the application. Arun Mohan has close ties to General Electric and has a long association with GE’s lawyers as a counsel. Further, Arun Mohan appears to be connected to the poisoning and drugging of the petitioner while she was living at G 4, FF, Jangpura Extension, where a woman living on the ground floor Rita Mohan was participating in targeting the petitioner and who was in touch with Arun Mohan at that time. The petitioner had named Arun Mohan as being involved in targeting her in an email complaint sent prior to 16 May 2013. That the outcome of the hearing of 16 May 2013 had been decided in advance is clear from the fact that that the matter was taken up  close to 4 pm and Arun Mohan was sitting in court especially for this matter and he was there because Judge Gita Mittal was intending to appoint him as amicus in the application. This was the only matter left before the Bench at that time on 16 May 2013, and there was therefore no other reason for Arun Mohan (who in any case is an extremely infrequent visitor to the Delhi High Court) to be present in court.

On 16 May 2013, Criminal Contempt Case 3/ 2012 being used to target the petitioner/ whistle blower in WP Civil 1280/ 2012 was also listed before Judge Gita Mittal. Under the Contempt of Courts Act, there is no provision for a private advocate like Arvind Nigam to be appointed amicus curie in a criminal contempt hearing. Yet Justice Gita Mittal first appointed Arvind Nigam as amicus in Criminal Contempt Case 3/ 2012 against the expressed objection of the petitioner and ignoring the petitioner’s request that the appropriate State counsel be asked to assist the Court if necessary and not a private and biased lawyer like Arvind Nigam.  Then Judge Gita Mittal appointed Arvind Nigam as amicus in CM 6096/ 2013 once again despite the objections of the Petitioner.

Judge Gita Mittal was deliberately attempting to involve Arvind Nigam in the hearing of WP Civil 1280/ 2012.

On 18 July 2013, a junior lawyer first appeared before Judge Gita Mittal on behalf of Arvind Nigam and stated in Court that Arvind Nigam was requesting to be excused from acting as amicus in CM 6096/ 2012 as Arvind Nigam had already communicated to Judge Gita Mittal. Judge Gita Mittal refused to accept this request and directed the junior lawyer to ask Mr Arvind Nigam to appear on the next date. What is important is that this establishes that Judge Gita Mittal and Arvind Nigam had between 16 May 2013 and 18 July 2013 engaged in private communication regarding WP Civil 1280/ 2012 outside Court and to the exclusion of the petitioner.

On 18 July 2013, the Petitioner/ whistle blower filed written submissions in both WP Civil 1280/ 2012 and in Criminal Contempt Case 3/ 2012 where she objected to the involvement of Arvind Nigam in these matters by raising the following objections:

“It was also inappropriate and improper for this Bench to appoint an amicus curie to “assist” in hearing and deciding this recusal application. This matter does not concern any other lawyer. It is a decision to be taken by the Bench alone.

It was inappropriate and improper for the Bench to appoint Mr Arvind Nigam, Sr Advocate, as amicus curie for CM 6096/ 2013 and for Criminal Contempt Case 3/ 2012. Mr Arvind Nigam has been part of the group of lawyers who have participated in harming the petitioner by destroying her reputation and by spying on her. in August 2011, the petitioner had first spoke to Arvind Nigam about her complaints against General Electric after she had realised that her life was in danger. The petitioner had asked Arvind Nigam for his help and had asked him for advice as to what legal steps she should take. Arvind Nigam had misguided the petitioner and had encouraged her to withdraw her complaints against General Electric by telling her that she would be “safe” if she did that. Based upon Arvind Nigam’s advice, the petitioner who at that time was terrified and isolated having failed to obtain assistance from the Police, then Chief Justice H S Kapadia, and from doctors she consulted at Max Healthcare for poisoning, decided to withdraw her complaints under duress and sent emails to this effect at the end of August 2011. This act of withdrawing her complaints placed the petitioner’s life in even greater danger and after that the petitioner was again isolated and continued to be drugged and poisoned until she decided to fight back at the end of December 2011.

In January and February 2012, after the petitioner started to regularly come to the Delhi High Court, the petitioner was again approached by Arvind Nigam. He was at this time spying on the petitioner as the petitioner had declared her intention to file legal proceedings. Arvind Nigam at this time offered to help the petitioner by acting as her counsel and by providing her with legal advice. The legal advice that Arvind Nigam offered was wrong and misleading again intended to send the petitioner down the wrong track. In fact after the petitioner’s first writ petition was wrongfully converted into a criminal writ petition, the petitioner decided to withdraw that and file a fresh civil writ petition. At this time, on or around 27 February 2012, Arvind Nigam asked to look at the revised draft petition that the petitioner was preparing. He first misguided the petitioner to split her petition into 3-4 separate petitions separating her request for protection from the whistleblower complaints and separating the complaints against medical doctors (for participating in the conspiracy to eliminate her) into a separate writ petition. After advising the petitioner to do this, Arvind Nigam offered to read the draft petitions and told the petitioner he would discuss them with her on 1 March 2012. The petitioner realised that Arvind Nigam was deliberately providing her with wrong legal advice and that he was trying to delay the petitioner in filing the new petition while attempts were continuing to eliminate the petitioner. The petitioner therefore ignored Arvind Nigam’s wrong advice and instead of waiting till 1 March 2012 to show him the draft petition, the petitioner went ahead and filed her consolidated writ petition on 29 February 2012. This act of the petitioner in ignoring Arvind Nigam’s motivated and malafide advice is another act that helped save the petitioner’s life.

Subsequent to these events, Arvind Nigam continued to spy on the petitioner and report back to General Electric’s lawyers on what the petitioner was intending. The petitioner was finally compelled to publicly name in email complaints sent to the authorities and even in court application(s) that Arvind Nigam was one of the lawyers who was targeting the petitioner.

The petitioner has made sexual harassment complaints against Soli Sorabjee and Raian Karanjawala, and Arvind Nigam is a close friend and associate of both these powerful lawyers.

Given this background, the petitioner objects to the appointment of and appearance by Arvind Nigam as amicus curie in WP (C ) 1280/ 2012 and in Criminal Contempt Case 3/ 2012. The petitioner has in May 2013 made Arvind Nigam aware of her opposition to his appointment as amicus curie.

The petitioner has already stated in CM 6096/ 2013 that she has no faith in the Bench of Justice Gita Mittal and Justice Deepa Sharma.”  

It has now come to the attention of the petitioner that Arvind Nigam was advising a General Electric company (GECAS) in 2010.

As a result of WP Civil 1280/ 2012 exposing corruption within the Railway Ministry and the Railway Board, CBI investigations of the Railway Board exposed the attempt of Railway Board member Mahesh Kumar to get appointed as Member-Engineering by bribing the then Railway Minister Pawan Bansal through his nephew Vijay Singla. This scam is connected to the corruption complaints in WP Civil 1280/ 2012 as the evidence produced in the writ petition also establishes that General Electric had bribed Railway Board members in the engineering division in 2010. Further, there is a possibility that the State was/ is using CBI investigations in 2013 and 2014 against Railway Board members to silence honest officers and to blackmail Railway officers to participate in the attempted cover up of the corruption complaints in WP Civil 1280/ 2012.

It has come to the attention of the Petitioner, that in 2013, Arvind Nigam has advised and represented Mahesh Kumar (the Railway Board member accused of bribing Pawan Bansal through Vijay Singla) in his bail application in the Delhi High Court.

How then can Arvind Nigam be involved in the hearing of WP Civil 1280/ 2012?

In any case, as CM 6096/ 2013 was disposed off without a hearing by Judges Gita Mittal and Deepa Sharma on 22 August 2013, Arvind Nigam cannot appear in WP Civil 1280/ 2012 any further. The order passed in WP Civil 1280/ 2012 on 22 August 2013 makes it clear that Arvind Nigam was only appointed as amicus in CM 6096/ 2012 and not in the writ petition. This order records Arvind Nigam’s appearance as follows:

“Mr.Arvind K. Nigam, Sr. Adv.  with Mr.Bhuvanesh Sehgal, Adv. And Mr.Manish, Adv. in IA No.6096/2013”.

When WP Civil 1280/ 2012 was listed before Judges P K Bhasin and Siddhartha Mridul, the order dated 9 October 2013 wrongly recorded Arvind Nigam’s appearance as amicus in WP Civil 1280/ 2012. On 11 October 2013, it was clarified by both the Petitioner and by Arvind Nigam to Judges P K Bhasin and Siddhartha Mridul that Arvind Nigam had not been appointed as amicus in the writ petition. Therefore Judges P K Bhasin and Siddhartha Mridul did not record the appearance of Arvind Nigam in the WP Civil 1280/ 2012 in their orders dated 8, 10 and 24 January 2014.

The order dated 28 January 2014 passed by Judges Kailash Gambhir and Sunita Gupta in WP Civil 1280/ 2012 also did not record the appearance of Arvind Nigam.

The order passed by Judges Sudershan Kumar Misra and Suresh Kait on the next hearing of WP Civil 1280/ 2012 on 30 January 2014 also did not record the appearance of Arvind Nigam even though he was present in Court for Criminal Contempt Case 3/ 2012.

On 11 February 2014, the Special Bench of Judges Sudershan Kumar Misra and Suresh Kait did not convene. Yet there is an order signed by this Bench for this date which records the appearance of Arvind Nigam as amicus in WP Civil 1280/ 2014. This order has not been uploaded on the website of the Delhi High court. The petitioner inspected the court file of WP Civil 1280/ 2012 on 13 February 2014 and was shocked to read that there was an order dated 11 February 2014 signed by both Judges Sudershan Kumar Misra and Suresh Kait in WP Civil 1280/ 2012 when the Division Bench did not even convene and that this order again attempts to involve Arvind Nigam in this writ petition by wrongly recording his appearance as amicus in WP Civil 1280/ 2012 on 11 February 2014. I brought this mistake to the notice of the court master and other court staff of Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra on 13, 14, and 15 February 2014 and requested that the wrong order be corrected. Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra himself did not hold Court either on 13 or 14 February 2014.

I also contacted Arvind Nigam and sent him the following text message on 15 February 2014.

“------ SMS ------

To: +919818776375

Sent: Feb 15, 2014 15:03

Subject: Arvind Nigam,

Arvind Nigam, Why does the 11 Feb order in my writ against GE show your appearance as amicus. You are not amicus in the matter. Did you mislead the court? I want this error corrrected. Seema Sapra”

I have not received a response from Arvind Nigam to this message. 

Till 15 February 2014, the patent error in the order dated 11 February 2014 recording Arvind Nigam’s appearance as amicus in WP Civil 1280/ 2012 had still not been corrected.

There appears to be a clear conspiracy in these repeated attempts to somehow drag Arvind Nigam into WP Civil 1280/ 2012 and the intent appears to be to use him to sabotage the hearing of this writ petition, to facilitate the cover up of the corruption complaints against General Electric and to facilitate the elimination of the Petitioner.

Seema Sapra  

Complaint dated 13 February 2014 against Justice Sudershan Kumar Misra for facilitating my being poisoned AND Complaint against Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra for corruptly granting a stay to Bhushan Steel in a coal block allotment matter on 11 February 2014- from General Electric whistleblower and advocate - Seema Sapra - Writ Petition (Civil) 1280/ 2012 - in the matter of Seema Sapra v. General Electric Company and Others in the Delhi High Court

Complaint emailed by me today: 

13 February 2014 

To

(i)                 Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court of India

(ii)               Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court 

(iii)             The Registrar General, Delhi High Court 

(iv)             Chairman, Bar Council of Delhi

(v)               All other members of Bar Council of Delhi

(vi)             Delhi Police Commissioner

(vii)           Registrar Vigilance, Delhi High Court

Ref: Whistle-blower corruption and right to life Writ Petition pending in the Delhi High Court since February 2012 – Writ Petition (Civil) 1280/ 2012 – in the matter of Seema Sapra versus General Electric Company & Others AND Complaint against Justice Sudershan Kumar Misra for facilitating my being poisoned AND Complaint against Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra for corruptly granting a stay to Bhushan Steel in a coal block allotment matter on 11 February 2014

I have been compelled to sleep in my car parked outside the house of Special Commissioner of Police Dharmendra Kumar in Rabindra Nagar for several months.

I am being poisoned in my car every night by being deliberately exposed to toxic fumes which are being released in the vicinity of my car at short intervals starting from around 4 am

Last night I was again being poisoned in this manner.

My right to life petition which is also a whistle-blower corruption petition against General Electric and Montek Singh Ahluwalia was listed before Delhi High Court Judges Sudershan Kumar Misra and Suresh Kait on 11 February 2014. I have asked this Bench to recuse itself from hearing this matter.

This is a Special Division Bench.

The matter was listed before Delhi High Court Judges Sudershan Kumar Misra and Suresh Kait on 30 January 2014. I was informed by Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra  in the morning at 10:30 am that the Special Bench would convene for my matter at 3:15 pm. Yet Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra deliberately delayed the hearing of his Single Bench matters to ensure that no time was left for hearing my matter. Several cases in which there was no urgency were deliberately heard by Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra at length and these matters were then simply adjourned.

Judges Sudershan Kumar Misra and Suresh Kait finally sat in a Division Bench at around 4:10 pm (court sits till 4.15 pm) and adjourned the matter unheard to 11 February 2014. I asked the Bench to recuse itself but they refused. I requested the Bench to give a shorter date and informed them that I was being poisoned and was sleeping in my car for a year now, but this was ignored by Delhi High Court Judges Sudershan Kumar Misra and Suresh Kait.

I was thereafter poisoned between 4 February 2014 and 11 February 2014.

In the meantime between 4 and 11 February 2014, I have made several complaints to the police and to others that I am being poisoned and these complaints have all been ignored. No one has even spoken to me about these complaints.

On 11 February 2014, I was informed by Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra at 10:30 am in the morning that the Special Division Bench would convene around 4 pm. I continued to wait for the Special Bench to convene. Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra deliberately delayed the convening of the Special Bench by continuing to hear single Bench matters until 5.19 pm.

At 5.19 pm Justice Sudershan Kumar Misra informed me that the Special Bench would not convene because Justice Suresh Kait had already gone for a judicial function. I ask how could a junior judge (J. Suresh Kait) go for a function and not make himself available for a Special Division bench while the senior judge was still hearing his Single Bench matters.

I then requested Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra to take up the matter the next day. Judge Sudershan Kumar Mishra refused to place the matter the next day or at an early date and instead insisted on adjourning the matter to 7 March 2014. I told Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra that there was grave urgency in the matter as I was being poisoned and had also been sleeping in my car now for almost a year. The Judge did not respond and failed to take these facts and statements made by me into consideration and has adjourned the matter to 7 March 2014 curtly telling me that I had his order.

As a result of Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra’s attitude to my statement that I was being poisoned, the police men attending court that day were celebrating later outside court and mocked me when I told them that the Delhi Police had despite court directions not provided me any protection and that I was being poisoned on a daily basis and that police-officers were committing contempt of court and colluding in such poisoning.

I was again poisoned during the intervening night of 12-13 February 2014 in my car and since 4 am repeatedly poisonous and toxic fumes were released near my car at short regular intervals by unknown persons who I suspect are policemen or are acting in collusion with police-officers.

I wanted to mention this poisoning before Chief Justice Ramana today or before Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra but the former did not hold court while the latter was on leave.

How could Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra ignore and disregard my statement in court that I (a whistleblower and an important witness in the corruption complaints before him in W.P. Civil 1280/ 2012) was being poisoned and refuse to take up the matter on an urgent basis?  Is Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra not facilitating my further ongoing poisoning and is he not responsible for my being poisoned again last night.

Complaint against Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra for corruptly granting a stay to Bhushan Steel in a coal block allotment matter on 11 February 2014.

I must also add a complaint regarding another matter that was heard by Justice Sudershan Kumar Misra sitting singly on 11 February 2014 when I was present in his court. This was a new petition filed by Bhushan Steel challenging the de-allocation of a coal-block allotted to it by the Government of India. Mr A S Chandhiok, Mr Mukul Rohatgi and Mr Neeraj Kaul instructed by Mr Rishi Agarwal appeared for Bhushan Steel while ASG Rajeeve Mehra instructed by Mr Sumit Pushkarna appeared for the Union of India. This was a matter filed pursuant to a cancellation of allotment of coal blocks being carried out by the Government of India because of allegations of corruption in these allocations to ineligible persons or without following proper procedures. The Supreme Court of India is seized of this matter and is hearing the petition on corruption in coal block allocations.

It appeared from court proceedings on 11 February 2014 that Mr A S Chandhiok, Mr Rajeeve Mehra and Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra were all part of a conspiracy to grant an injunction to Bhushan Steel against the Union of India.

19 other coal block allottees have already approached the Delhi High Court for similar orders which matters were all listed before Justice Manmohan who refused to grant a stay in all these 19 matters.

The Bhushan Steel matter was deliberately filed through Mr Rishi Agarwal because due to a conflict of interest, Mr Agarwal’s matters are not listed before Justice Manmohan. Bhushan Steel was therefore able to avoid Justice Manmohan’s court.

As a result the matter eventually came before Justice Sudershan Kumar Misra. Managing the registry (particularly Registrar Lorren Bamniyal) to get matters listed before a particular judge is a well-known corrupt practice amongst lawyers.

The corrupt conspiracy to obtain a stay for Bhushan Steel is evident from the following. Justice Sudershan Kumar Misra received the file when he was already in court therefore he had no time to peruse the file and therefore could not have known anything about this fresh matter before him. Yet in court, his statements showed that he had substantial knowledge about the facts of the matter. ASG Rajeeve Mehra stated that he had no instructions and could have gotten the matter adjourned to the next day but did not press for this. Mr Chandhiok made negligible arguments. Justice Sudershan Kumar Misra was making the arguments in favour of the petitioner. ASG Rajeeve Mehra made no arguments to oppose the grant of stay.

Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra then asked Rajeeve Mehra if he would make a statement on behalf of the Union of India that the Government would not de-allocate/ reallocate the coal block before the writ was decided. Rajeeve Mehra did not oppose the grant of stay but merely stated that he could not make a statement but that there could be no objection to a stay/ direction by the court, thereby conceding the issue of grant of injunction.

Interestingly another similar matter was being heard before Justice Manmohan at the same time in which stay was again refused.

ASG Rajeeve Mehra did not adequately protect the Union of India’s interests in this matter during the court hearing and instead facilitated the grant of stay by making concessions.

The fact that the outcome of this matter was fixed in advance with Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra was also evident by the manner in which the judge dictated his order. While dictating his order, Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra recorded facts and submissions which were not stated by Mr A S Chandhiok for the petitioner. Also it appeared that Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra was reading the order from a pre-typed sheet. This was clear from the speed at which the order was dictated as well as from the fact that Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra did not need to consult the court record while dictating the order on facts and submissions which did not form part of Mr A S Chandhiok’s oral submissions in court.

I point out that ASG Rajeeve Mehra used to be Mr A S Chandhiok’s junior and both of them enjoy a reputation for corrupt practices. Similarly Justice Sudershan Kumar Misra’s reputation amongst lawyers is also not clean.

The outcome in this matter further supports the complaint that this case was rigged in advance. Bhushan Steel managed to obtain an injunction from Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra when in similar circumstances, 20 other coal block allottees failed to obtain injunctions from Judge Manmohan obviously because the action of the Government of India is being monitored by the Supreme Court which is hearing the coal-block matter. 

Seema Sapra

Advocate

seema.sapra@gmail.com

9582716748

Bloomberg story on SEC protecting General Electric and KPMG on violations of auditing rules

"Bloomberg

Is the SEC Going Easy on General Electric?

By Jonathan Weil - Jan 24, 2014

The Securities and Exchange Commission unveiled a curious settlement today with KPMG LLP over violations of auditor-independence rules. And it looks like the agency went out of its way to protect the Big Four accounting firm and its longtime audit client, General Electric Co.

The settlement papers came in two parts. The first was an administrative order, under which the firm will pay $8.2 million in fines and disgorgement. The SEC said KPMG provided bookkeeping and other prohibited services to three audit clients. The SEC said some KPMG partners also owned stock in one of the clients, which is a no-no.

The SEC didn't name the clients, which is odd, because the agency has in other auditor-independence cases. One that comes to mind was a 2010 settlement with a former vice chairman at Deloitte & Touche LLP, Thomas Flanagan, who was caught trading shares of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and other Deloitte audit clients. Another was a 2002 case against KPMG, which was the auditor for AIM Funds at the same time it had invested $25 million in one of the mutual funds that AIM ran.

The second part of today's settlement offers more intrigue. The SEC issued a separate report about an investigation into KPMG's practice of lending tax professionals from its own staff to certain audit clients. Once again, the SEC didn't name any of the companies. But it's a safe bet that one of them was GE.

Francine McKenna, who writes about accounting and auditing for her website re: The Auditors, broke the story in March 2011 that KPMG was doing this at GE. Some of the KPMG employees working at GE even were given GE e-mail addresses, she reported.

The SEC spent much of its report explaining what sorts of staff-lending arrangements it had uncovered at KPMG and why they are prohibited. Audit firms' employees aren't allowed to act as employees of an audit client. "The legal consequence of an auditor lacking independence is that it violates, and causes its audit clients to violate, various provisions of the federal securities laws," the report said. The commission said it issued the report "in order to address uncertainty regarding the commission's interpretation" of its rules on the subject.

The report also said "the commission has determined not to pursue an enforcement action with regard to these loaned staff engagements." However, it didn't explain why. And given all of the secrecy, I can't help but wonder.

KPMG has been GE's auditor for more than 100 years. GE is a systemically important financial institution, because of its GE Capital finance arm. The company paid KPMG almost $100 million in fees for 2012. It has paid the firm more than $1.3 billion since 2000. Former SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro, who left the agency in December 2012, joined GE's board last year. And you never know what a fresh pair of eyes might find on GE's books if the SEC ever ordered it to get a new accounting firm.

Could any of those things have been an issue when the SEC decided not to name any audit clients? Or penalize KPMG for lending them its tax staff? Or disqualify KPMG as GE's outside auditor? An SEC spokesman, John Nester, declined to comment."

Read at http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-24/is-the-sec-going-easy-on-general-electric-.html